THE GUARANTEE OF PRODUCTS’ UNIQUENESS. Our writers (experts, masters, bachelor, and doctorate) write all the papers from scratch and always follow the instructions of the client to the blogger.com the order Paul Graham Essays is completed, it is verified that each copy that does not present plagiarism with Paul Graham Essays the latest software to ensure that it is % unique Apr 28, · Paul graham essays wealth for ronald takaki the harmful myth of asian superiority thesis. Apr 28, Unfortunately, there is evidence of your discussion of an argument, a 1, page college writing as part of it. But the issue with these structures may not necessarily making students aware of iranian religious conflict in his book txtng: The The reason Graham's essay isn't entitled "Hackers and Pastry Chefs" is not because there is something that unites painters and programmers into a secret brotherhood, but because Paul Graham likes to cultivate the arty aura that comes from working in the visual arts. Having been both a painter and a programmer, I can certainly sympathize with him
What makes Paul Graham a great writer? — Ellen Fishbein
February What should an essay be? Many people would say persuasive. That's what a lot of us were taught essays should be. But I think we can aim for something more ambitious: that an essay should be useful, paul graham essays. To start with, that means it should be correct. But it's not enough merely to be correct.
It's easy to make a statement correct by making it vague. That's a common flaw in academic writing, for example. If you know nothing at all about an issue, you can't go wrong by saying that the issue is a complex one, that there are many factors to be considered, that it's a mistake to take too simplistic a paul graham essays of it, and so on.
Though no doubt correct, such statements tell the reader nothing. Useful paul graham essays makes claims that are as strong as they can be made without becoming false.
For example, it's more useful to say that Pike's Peak is near the middle of Colorado than merely somewhere in Colorado. But if I say it's in the exact middle of Colorado, I've now gone too far, because it's a bit east of the middle. Precision and correctness are like opposing forces. It's easy to satisfy one if you ignore the other.
The paul graham essays of vaporous academic writing is the bold, but false, rhetoric of demagogues. Useful writing is bold, but true. It's also two other things: it tells people something important, paul graham essays, and that at least some of them didn't already know.
Telling people something they didn't know doesn't always mean surprising them, paul graham essays. Sometimes it means telling them something they knew unconsciously but had never put into words. In fact those may be the more valuable insights, because they tend to be more fundamental. Let's put them all together.
Useful writing tells people something true and important that they didn't already know, and tells them as unequivocally as possible. Notice these are all a matter of degree. For example, you can't expect an idea to be novel to everyone. Any insight that you have will probably have already been had by at least one of the world's 7 billion people. But it's sufficient if an idea is novel to a lot of readers.
Ditto for correctness, paul graham essays, and strength. In effect the four components are like numbers you can multiply together to paul graham essays a score for usefulness.
Which I realize is almost awkwardly reductive, but nonetheless true. Believe it or not, there is a trick for doing this. I paul graham essays it from my friend Robert Morris, who has a horror of saying anything dumb. His trick is not to say anything unless he's sure it's worth hearing. This makes it hard to get opinions out of him, but paul graham essays you do, they're usually right.
Translated into essay writing, what this means is that if you write a bad sentence, you don't publish it. You delete it and try again. Often you abandon whole branches of four or five paragraphs.
Sometimes a whole essay. You can't ensure that every idea you have is good, but you can ensure that every one you publish is, by simply not publishing the ones that aren't. In the sciences, this is called publication bias, and is considered bad. When some hypothesis you're exploring gets inconclusive results, you're supposed to tell people about that too. But with essay writing, publication bias is the way to go, paul graham essays.
My strategy is loose, then tight. I write the first draft of an essay fast, trying out all kinds of ideas. Then I spend days rewriting it very carefully. I've never tried to count how many times I proofread essays, but I'm sure there are sentences I've read times before publishing them, paul graham essays.
When I proofread an essay, there are usually passages that stick out in an annoying way, sometimes because they're clumsily written, and sometimes because I'm not sure they're true. The annoyance starts out unconscious, but after the tenth reading or so I'm saying "Ugh, that part" each time I paul graham essays it. They become like briars that catch your sleeve as you walk past. Usually I won't publish an essay till they're all gone � till I can read through the whole thing without the feeling of anything catching.
I'll sometimes let through a sentence that seems clumsy, if I can't think of a way to rephrase it, but I will never knowingly let through one that doesn't seem correct. You never have to. If a sentence doesn't seem right, all you have to do is ask why it doesn't, and you've usually got the replacement right there in your head. This is where essayists have an advantage over journalists. You don't have a deadline. You can work for as long on an essay as you need to get it right.
You don't have to publish the essay at all, if you can't get it right. Mistakes seem to lose courage in the face of an enemy with unlimited resources.
Or that's what it feels like. What's really going on is that you have different expectations for yourself. You're like a parent saying to a child "we can sit here all night till you eat your vegetables. I'm not saying no mistake gets through. For example, I added condition c in "A Way to Paul graham essays Bias" after readers pointed out that I'd omitted it.
But in practice you can catch nearly all of them. There's a trick for getting importance too. It's like the trick I suggest to young founders for getting startup ideas: to make something you yourself want. You can use yourself as a proxy for the reader.
The reader is not completely unlike you, so if you write about topics that seem important to you, they'll probably seem important to a significant number paul graham essays readers as well. Importance has two factors. It's the paul graham essays of people something matters to, times how much it matters to them. Which means of course that it's not a rectangle, but a sort of ragged comb, like a Riemann sum.
The way to get novelty is to write about topics you've thought about a lot. Then you can use yourself as a proxy for the reader in this department too. Anything you notice that surprises you, who've thought about the topic a lot, will probably also surprise a significant number of readers. And here, paul graham essays, as with correctness and importance, you can use the Morris technique to ensure that you will.
If you don't learn anything from writing an essay, don't publish it. You need humility to measure novelty, because acknowledging the novelty of an idea means acknowledging your previous ignorance of it. Confidence and humility are often seen as opposites, but in this case, as in many others, confidence helps you to be humble.
If you know you're an expert on some topic, you can freely admit when you learn something you didn't know, paul graham essays, because you can be confident that most other people wouldn't know it either. The fourth component of useful writing, strength, comes from two things: thinking well, and the skillful use of qualification.
These two counterbalance each other, like the accelerator and clutch in a car with a manual transmission. As you try to refine the paul graham essays of an idea, you adjust the qualification accordingly.
Something you're sure of, you can state baldly with no qualification at all, as I did the four components of useful writing. Whereas points that seem dubious have to be held at arm's length with perhapses, paul graham essays.
As you refine an idea, you're paul graham essays in the direction of less qualification. But you can rarely get it down to zero. Sometimes you don't even want to, paul graham essays, if it's a side point and a fully refined version would be too long.
Some say that qualifications weaken writing. For example, paul graham essays, that you should never begin a sentence in an essay with "I think," because if you're saying it, then of course you think it.
And it's true that "I think x" is a weaker statement than simply "x. But qualifications are not scalars. They're not just experimental error. There must be 50 things they can express: how broadly something applies, how you know it, how happy you are it's so, even how it could be falsified. I'm not going to try to explore the structure of qualification here. It's probably more complex than the whole topic of writing usefully, paul graham essays.
Instead I'll just give you a practical tip: Don't underestimate qualification. It's an important skill in its own right, not just a sort of tax you have to pay in order to avoid saying things that are false.
So learn and use its full range. It may not be fully half of having good ideas, but it's part of having them.
Lecture 3 - Before the Startup (Paul Graham)
, time: 48:08What I Worked On
This essay is so good I often send it to people who have no interest in technology or startups and wouldn't otherwise know or care who paul graham is. This essay comes from a wise, spiritual place. (random example of applicability beyond genre: just as people who think sci-fi is always about science or machines not humans or love should see The Inner Light (Star Trek: The Next Generation).) Jun 11, · Paul Graham is the founder of Y Combinator.. Paul Graham has been one of my favourite thinkers and has helped many entrepreneurs including me to Remember the essays you had to write in high school? Topic sentence, introductory paragraph, supporting paragraphs, conclusion. The conclusion being, say, that Ahab in Moby Dick was a Christ-like figure. Oy. So I'm going to try to give the other side of the story: what an essay really is, and how you write one. Or at least, how I write one. Mods
No comments:
Post a Comment